Santa’s Gift Request and Fulfillment Workflow

We got a rather urgent request from Santa yesterday to digitize and streamline the gift request and fulfillment process. It seems that the high volume of gift requests, as well as involvement of Mrs. Claus, who thought Santa was a bit too generous with high-end gifts, really slowed down the operation. With barely 36 hours left Santa was really concerned and reached out to us about digitizing and streamlining the whole process using ZFlow.

After looking at the current situation we recommended that Mrs. Claus review gift requests that are above $1,000 and let others go directly to Santa. Mrs. Claus was fine with our suggestion. In the new streamlined process, we added a rule that would involve Mrs. Claus only when the estimated cost of the gift is more than $1,000.

In addition, since all the stakeholders related to the process (Santa’s COO, Santa’s helpers…) are on the same page they get advanced visibility into the requests so that they can plan their work properly. In the process below, gift preparation is done by Santa’s helpers and gift delivery is supported by Santa, Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, and Rudolph.

 

 

 

The following roles were designed to support the process

 

The list below shows who is performing the roles as part of the workflow

 

My Gift Request

I quickly took advantage of the request process to put in my gift request.

 

I hope Mrs. Claus approves my request. I know Santa will given how much he likes fast cars.

 

And look what I found in our garage this morning. Thank you Mrs. and Mr Claus!

 

 

Santa’s Gift Request and Fulfillment Workflow

We got a rather urgent request from Santa today to digitize and streamline the gift request and fulfillment process. It seems that the high volume of gift requests, as well as involvement of Mrs. Claus, who thought Santa was a bit too generous with high-end gifts, really slowed down the operation. With barely 36 hours left Santa was really concerned and reached out to us about digitizing and streamlining the whole process using ZFlow.

After looking at the current situation we recommended that Mrs. Claus review gift requests that are above $1,000 and let others go directly to Santa. Mrs. Claus was fine with our suggestion. In the new streamlined process, we added a rule that would involve Mrs. Claus only when the estimated cost of the gift is more than $1,000.

In addition, since all the stakeholders related to the process (Santa’s COO, Santa’s helpers…) are on the same page they get advanced visibility into the requests so that they can plan their work properly. In the process below, gift preparation is done by Santa’s helpers and gift delivery is supported by Santa, Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, and Rudolph.

 

 

 

The following roles were designed to support the process

 

The list below shows who is performing the roles as part of the workflow

 

My Gift Request

I quickly took advantage of the request process to put in my gift request.

 

I hope Mrs. Claus approves my request. I know Santa will given how much he likes fast cars.

 

And look what I found in our garage this morning. Thank you Mrs. and Mr Claus!

 

 

Opportunity-to-Cash (OTC) Process Orchestration for Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and Hardware Companies

Digitizing Lead-to-Cash process is one of the best ways to improve sales performance, fulfillment, customer experience and time-to-usage-and-billing in software-as-a-service (SaaS) and hybrid hardware+software companies. In fact, the effectiveness and speed with which SaaS, PaaS and IaaS organizations can execute the lead-to-cash process can determine many of the key metrics, including Customer Acquisition Cost, Lead Velocity, Recurring Revenue Growth, Net New Recurring Revenue, and others.

 

Streamlining Lead-to-Cash process to be digital and effective is anything but simple because of the cross-functional nature and number of systems and people that are involved. Specific pain points include:

  • Orchestrating Sub-processes (complex quote development, new customer onboarding, partner based manufacturing and fulfillment, provisioning software/hardware, billing set up)
  • Master Data Management(Customer Master, Product Master (Initial and Lifecycle), Pricing Master, Vendor Master) and Process Synchronization across CRM, Subscription Billing, and ERP systems
  • Closing the loop between Customer-facing, fulfillment and ERP systems (Changes to orders, renewals and amendments..)
  • Uniform view of the main Lead-To-Cash process and sub-processes across CRM and ERP systems and for all Stakeholders

Getting Your SAP System Ready For Remote Work

The global coronavirus pandemic is truly a once in a lifetime black-swan event. And we seem to be in the early stages of an unfolding multi-faceted (public safety, economic, and supply chain) crisis. As of today the more than half of the world’s population is staying home to mitigate the spread and to flatten the curve. In addition, it is increasingly looking like the crisis in varying degrees will be with us until a proven vaccine is taken by majority of the world’s population. As a result the trend of remote work is here to stay with us for the foreseeable future. Email, video-conferencing, messaging will be main modes of collaboration for getting work done.

However, many of the key processes that run the business on a day-to-day basis rely on ERP systems like SAP. And SAP, especially the older versions, have not been very amenable to remote and collaborative work for a variety of reasons. With ZFlow for SAP, your SAP ERP system regardless of its age, transforms into a collaborative business process portal accessible by anyone, anytime, and from everywhere.

We have also made ZFlow free to use until Dec 31, 2020. In Q4 2020, we will make a decision on whether we should extend the free use of ZFlow into 2021.

 

A New Era for Master Data Management

Considering the importance of master data for achieving operational excellence in finance, purchasing, sales, commerce, manufacturing and supply chain, it is a surprise how inadequately and ineffectively current master data management (MDM) solutions support the master data lifecycle management. We know a thing or two about Master Data because master data management (MDM) workflows are some of the most popular workflows deployed on ZFlow.

We also developed significant appreciation for Master Data because of deep support for New Product and Supply Chain Development in ZFlow. As a matter of fact, what we have seen is that much of the master data (creation/changes) is usually an outcome of product development and supply chain processes. Most certainly Master Data Management is not

 

In addition,

How Master Data Management Really Looks like

Instead master data management should be an outcome of business workflows like this

New Supplier Creation

 

 

New SKU

 

Materials Master Data Management

Materials MDM needs its own post – Mastering Materials Master Data Management.

ZFlow for Master Data Management

ZFlow is a fresh and effective take on Master Data Management. Master Data Management in ZFlow is an outcome of functional business processes related to New Product Development and Introduction, Commerce, Procurement, Supply Chain Planning, Logistics and Maintenance Planning. In addition, it is reimagined take on what an effective master data management solution should support

 

Lastly, ZFlow also happens to be the most customer friendly solution in the market.

 

How Excel and ZFlow solve the complex sales quote problem elegantly

While selling is an art, quoting can be maddeningly bureaucratic, riddled with errors, and the pace plodding. The Configure, Price and Quote (CPQ) software experience has been, like many things that come out of the world of enterprise software, mostly disappointing. Part of the problem is that there is no end to configurability of quotes and selling is pretty elastic. As a result sales people and analysts run into the hard constraints and rigidity that CPQ systems impose. And the cost of CPQ systems and related implementation can rival GDPs of small nations. Hence the popularity of Excel as the CPQ system of choice. However, just using Excel as the quoting system can lead to process, visibility, search and query related issues.

A few of our customers that have complex CPQ logic and processes have instead decided to use their existing CPQ engines built in Excel and ZFlow (which has tight integration with Excel) to get the best of both worlds. Below is one such scenario. The advantages of this approach are many, including

  • Ability to continue using CPQ logic developed (often over many years) in Excel
  • Sales analysts can still retain control over the CPQ logic as opposed to heavy customization of CPQ, which is usually hard to do and not accessible
  • Support comprehensive workflow that is based on business rules dependent of quote values (for example, a million dollar quote needs to CFO approval)
  • Full visibility of the quote process to all participants
  • A much more flexible and usable CPQ process at a fraction of the cost of CPQ systems

 

 

Simple workflows are usually more effective than procure-to-pay solutions

As the Digital Workflow for the Modern Supply Chain we often support procurement workflows. Here we sometimes encounter the poorer cousins of finance and ERP solutions in the shape of procure-to-pay (aka P2P) solutions. Don’t blame us for that unimaginative, and slightly icky, acronym.

What is odd about procure-to-pay solutions is that they tend to equate procurement to buying papers and pencils. We, however, equate procurement to the full lifecycle of supply chain relationship, which includes the dating that happens before companies become supply chain partners, collaboration that happens throughout and not just when a purchase order (PO) is issued, internal processes for purchase requisitions, on-boarding new suppliers, quality and continuous improvement processes, audits, sharing forecasts, etc.

Our experience indicates that most companies gain very little value, and zero competitive advantage, by adopting procure-to-pay solutions that focus on paper and pencil buying processes. In fact, because of ever changing supply chain relationships, procure-to-pay solutions are severely under used and often replicate what is already in place in ERP solutions. A simple Purchase Requisition workflow on top of existing ERP can often provide 50% or more value of the procure-to-pay solution for many customers. Here is a little secret. In most cases, payment processes are triggered in ERP solutions. So the “pay” part of procure-to-pay is seldom used.

ZFlow provides a continuum of workflows that support the full lifecycle of supply chain partnership, including

  • Supplier Research, Qualification and Selection
  • Request for Information/Proposal
  • Design/Engineering Collaboration
  • New Supplier On-boarding
  • Purchase Requisition
  • Purchase Order Collaboration
  • Forecast Sharing
  • Non-conformance Reporting
  • Failure Reporting and Corrective Action System
  • Supplier PPAP (Production Part Approval Process)
  • Supplier Audit
  • Kaizen Events

Yes, we have a bit more complete view of the supply chain relationship unlike the paper-and-pencil pushing procure-to-pay solutions. That is because Procurement is a lot more than just buying paper and pencils.